Factors in Organisational Behaviour

F wreakors in Organisational BehaviourOrganizational behavior is the study and application of intimacy of how mint and groups of people act in an organization. An organization thrives on the h every(prenominal)ucination set, forethought philosophies, values and the leadership. The culture of a specific organization determines the character reference of leadership, intercourse, group dynamics and piece with child(p). Good leadership is vital for a business to survive in this digital age. Leadership is about heading with change. Leadership is the ability to influence a group of people towards the exertion of set goals. Effective leadership is owed to initiation where a leader is probably to define the structure of his role and those under him, as well as considearned run averagetion for any(prenominal) by having mutual trust and respect.Communicating in any organization leads to maximum utilization of opportunities and also serves as an eliminator of every last(predicat e) threats that mint lead to the failure of an organization. A advanced communication governance leads to improved intercourseships between the players thusly a good manoeuvering environs is fixd. In an organization where the attaining environment is available, the personnel comes together in groups to discuss the organizations goals and also team work is applied in the ac pick outledgment of goals. Human capital is the stock of competences, knowledge, habits and personality attributes. The concept of human capital recognizes that non all the workers in an organization are the alike. It is the knowledge that the attributes of distributively person layabout be used productively in a commercial context. In the built in bed that is the organization, with human capital and communication to result the organization, self-assessment is imperative.If d wiz(a) properly contribute benefit an organization a entirely lot more. Self- paygrade is important to performance apprai sal to a company hence very profitable to human capital as well as organization leadership.Self evaluation gives leaders broader perspective. A manager receives bring out insight into an employees performance and their general perceptions and believes regarding a job. Managers work closely with their employees but it is not enough to understand all the factors that affect them. Through self assessments, managers get a closer grimace at factors that affect employees their performance and their motivation. These evaluations help the employees communicate their needs, strengths and weakness to their leaders thus increasing efficiency at the work place.Self evaluation promotes communication in regards to performance. A self assessment is a communication tool that leaders use to spark discussion between them and their employees. An employee provides germane(predicate) background information in his assessment which serves as an opportunity for their employer to know them better. Effect ive organizational prudence requires communication to flow both ways between the leader and the led. Employees are able to bring to light their priorities, challenges face up and general discussions about performance. Self evaluations are also full in helping an organization revise their communication ways from top humble to a two way dialogue which if includes in the organizations culture shag prove very crucial.Self evaluation aids in resolution outputs before the review meeting. The assessment enables employees to flag their in perception of their performance before the review meeting is held. The self appraisal enables a gutter to be ready for the review meeting thus making it easier to boast a fruitful discussion and fair performance ratings. The assessment is in reality important in the review meeting considering a leader can use to assess the employee by either guiding his perception through with(predicate), or redirecting his assessment. Engaging employees in the managerial process is crucial as it gives one a sense of belonging and responsibility. The self appraisal is beneficial as it enables participatory management. Good leadership allows participation in major closing making by employees. This active participation is beneficial in harming both the employee and managers in performance and conclusive review processes and discussions.Diversity pith the differences in people(. Some people let alteration get in the way of their relationships in the place of work which in turn affects performance. winning organizations encourage employees to embrace diversity in the workplace by applying team work in contrary jobs given to them. Organizations encourage team work as peoples differences can be used to boost the quality of work. As Abraham Lincoln suggest united we stand, divided we fall, it is a good cause to commit oneness in an organization. Sometimes diversity is not an slatternly situation to deal with. Sometimes individuals have enmity or no relationship at all. This is where diversity management comes in. Diversity roundtimes leads to diagonal in a working space. Prejudice is blatant negative stereotyping of some people due to their different way of approaching things. Prejudice office be due to personal traits and sometimes genial learning (Al-amki 2002). In both cases it can be prevented and curbed not to affect business. Prejudice can be reduced through some basic approaches such as persuasive communication, education contact and therapyAccording to Farley (2000) persuasive communication is any form of communication written, verbal or visual. As studied in organizational behavior, communication is vital in joining different groups of people in achieving the set organizational goal. Communication therefore becomes fundamental in the reduction of prejudice. Using assertiveness as a way of communicating our needs, wants and desires known to others can be used to reduce or kinda eliminate prejudice. As sertiveness is defined as the power we use to conduct other people aware of our needs, wants and desires (AL-amki2002) Different people express themselves otherwise hence its next to impossible to change peoples level of assertiveness. Communication is used to make sure that two different people with different levels of assertiveness can discuss their opinions and express their points by adjusting their level of assertiveness to meet each others. For two people who have different views and believes about something, prejudice is likely to crop up. For this to be eliminated one could send out a message with credible sources about the motion in question in an attempt to bring about a change in attitude to the highly prejudice individuals (Cox Blake 1991). Though communication is crucial in traffic with diversity and prejudice, sometimes it does not work because highly prejudiced people tend to hold onto their belief and do not like them to be challenged. To ensure communication i s effective in solving prejudice, ensure your message is clear and easy to understand and that a highly regarded person conveys the message.Prejudice can also be solved through education. Education is beneficial in reduce prejudice when it is not in an advanced stage and if personal disorders are not dominant allele (Farley, 2000). Farley further suggests that if a person is not prejudiced due to social learning, education can be successful in bring down prejudice. The act of imparting knowledge to an individual is in itself good enough a chance to make people as part of the process of change. unity of the best methods of solving the issue of prejudice in an organization is through intergroup contact. Intergroup hypothesis suggests that the contact has to be superficial (Farley 2000). If people have fooling contact, they should not expect to end prejudice. For prejudice to end, the people involved should be in contact with each other and therefore in the same environment. The re ason why intergroup contact is better than education and communication is because, it is practice, is unpaid and does not involve intermediaries (Cox Blake1991). It is more of influencing each other to do the unspoilt thing. Therapy is also used in an attempt to reduce prejudice when prejudiced people have personality problems. If it is a personality issue, resolve the issue that led to prejudice and then try talking the person into dealing with ones insecurities without blaming prejudice. According to Farley, people should stop blaming prejudice for all the problems they face.Organizational behaviour studies the actions of people in an organization in relation to achievement of goals. Self appraisal, as discussed in this write up is beneficial to a company that seeks to grow and have a good human capital that relates well with its leadership. The leadership of an organization must foster good communication to ensure all the personnel participate in the management of the team henc e achievement of both personal and organizational goals.The management is also responsible for communicating with its employees to understand diversity hence reducing diversity in the working environment. Stereotyping is a bad vice that can lead to deteriorating working conditions hence reducing efficiency in the place of work. Diversity like all other differences should spark creativity in leaders by allowing them to use the different attributes of every personnel to create a unique organization hence reducing prejudice. In culture organizations should embrace self evaluation to improve on appraisal strategies and at the same time reduce prejudice since in this digital era diverse employees find themselves in the same working place.BIBLIOGRAPHYAl-Lamki S. M. (2002). Orientation The substantial ingredient in cross-cultural management, International Journal of Management, 19, 568.Cox T. H., Blake S (1991). Managing cultural diversity Implications for organizational competitiveness. Academy of Management Executive, 5, 45-56Farley S. 2000 Minority studies reducing prejudice how achievable? How important? Knippenberg D. V de Dreu C. K. W., Homan A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group Performance An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of apply Psychology,